Thursday, December 6, 2007
Reflecting on my understanding of Diverse Literature
Tuesday, November 27, 2007
Reflecting on LBGTQ Literature as a Topic/ My Text Set
Missing! Picture Books Reflecting Gay and Lesbian Families
Sunday, November 25, 2007
"Sticks and stones may break our bones, but names will break our spirit"
-from The Misfits.
Friday, November 23, 2007
..."And Tango Makes Three..."
"Yes it's hard love, but it's love all the same" --Bob Franke
Wittlinger, Ellen. Hard Love. New York: Simon & Schuster Children's Publishing, 1999.
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Confessions of a Closet Catholic QTT
Hey group, here's portions of my paper I thought would be useful, also. =) I'm not exactly sure why it did both single and double spacing, though!
Representations of Guilt
Part Two: Confessions of a Closet Catholic is rich with religious representations, but I will point out the ones that further the question I have posed for my group. The first example I chose to illustrate the question I posed shows how Justine’s obsession with sin causes her to obsess about ways to get all her sins forgiven, all the time when she says, “I figure I’d better do some catching up on the confessing front, especially if I’m going to mass on Sunday. I don’t want to be caught in church with sins on my conscience,” (26). How does Justine’s desire to be clear of sin lead her into more guilt? Why does Justine have such a desire to make sure her conscience is clear? What does Justine not understand yet that makes her so worried about not having a clear conscience?
The next passage I will use as an example shows how serious Justine is about her guilt. She believes her grandmother’s stroke is her fault and in this realization, “A wave of guilt washes over me, guilt so strong that I feel sick to my stomach and start to cry. Because I know it’s my fault. For sitting in church and thinking how good it felt when Tommy’s arm touched mine, committing the Deadly Sin of Lust instead of praying and thinking about holier things” (52). Why does Justine tie every bad event in her life to an act of sinning? How does this make you, as a reader, feel about Catholicism, through her eyes?
The third passage I will point out is Justine thinking, “But most of all I wished God had punished me, instead of taking it out on my poor old Bubbe, who’s already suffered so much in her life” (54). What is Justine’s rationale for God punishing Bubbe? How does that work with the notion of sins and forgiveness and punishment that Justine believes? How does Justine justify that Bubbe was punished because of her sin? The last passage I am going to have my group turn to is when Justine is dealing with Bubbe’s death. Justine says, “It’s even worse because I know that if it weren’t for me, she would still be here. Guilt presses down on me like a two-hundred ton weight” (134). Where is this guilt coming from? Does Justine still believe the Catholic God is punishing her for her sins by taking Bubbe from her? What do all these passages about Justine’s guilt represent to the reader when finding out she is trying to be as Catholic as she can? Is Justine’s worry and obsession with sin an accurate portrayal of a young woman figuring out her beliefs and delving into her own spirituality?
Part 3: Why is it important to represent a young girl struggling with her spirituality, more importantly, a young Jewish girl looking to convert to Catholicism? Let’s examine Linda Silver’s statement in Judging Judaica when she says, “We have arrived at a broad interpretation that looks a t a book in its totality and judges how authentically it portrays the individual characters in their interplay with Jewish belief, history, values and practice” (Silver 235). According to this idea, does Justine seem like an individual character portrayed in an authentic way?
Sunday, November 11, 2007
weekend connections.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
Richard Scrimger's Point of View
So, after finishing this book, I was curious about the author, Scrimger, and was curious if maybe he was also blind, and it made me kind of think about the ongoing "insider vs. outsider" debate, so like most college students, i advantageously remembered the helpful search engine known as google, and I googled Richard Scrimger, and went to his website. After being quite intrigued by his website, I wanted to learn more, so I went to his personal blog, and read on.
I encourage everyone in class to take a look at this blog. He has a very unique, interesting, and insightful blog...and did I mention funny? also, not on the same caliber of children's literature =)
enjoy....
http://scrimger.blogspot.com/
happy snooping!
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
LBGT[Q] Memory Sparked.
The news was reporting on a "controversial" new book that was coming out, called My Two Dad's [or something to that effect] and it was all over the news that these books were coming out and being from grand rapids, people were completely up in arms about the idea of a book about a homosexual couple raising a child, and it was banned at all schools, there were even protests at our local public library about banning the book. Basically, people found it awful that a group within the LBGT[Q] umbrella group was being represented in a book for children. At the time of course I didn't really understand it or what it was about, but that memory and a vivid picture of one of the pages stuck out in my mind, even to this day, because in conservative GR, things like that weren't talked about during that time. I now realize how hurtful and prejudiced such actions like that are, and I don't think if that book came out now there would be the same uproar as there was 12ish years ago, but it just reminds me how hard it is for underrepresented groups to try and break into the 'mainstream' when it is so easy for the 'mainstream' to ban and discount them.
I realize how important it is to try and represent all groups possible in my personal library because I'm sure that book is very relatable for many kids and having that available may help a student going through a tough time and they may be able to find validation in something as simple as me having books representing different kinds of families available for them to be able to read about.
Monday, October 15, 2007
Schneider Family Book Award
Sunday, September 23, 2007
A second try at this post....Outsider vs. Insider Debate.
On discussing the inside vs outside debate, I found these articles very helpful in forming an opinion on the subject. These articles helped me to see the different aspects of what is and isn't multicultural literature and who and what constitutes an insider and an outsider.
So, after reading Bishop's article, I agree with her statement that, "White writers frequently bring to their fiction about African-Americans a perspective that is not well informed about African American culture as do writers who know it from the inside because it is the way they have been acculturated."
This is what I would label an "outsider." One who is not well informed and writes on what could become stereotypical to a culture group or even offensive to the group.
On the other hand, I do believe an "outsider" can become an "insider" on a culture group and Harris supports this when saying, "Critical consciousness eneabled her to create an excellent examination of the depiction of Native Americans." Harris was discussing a non-Native American writer who wrote about the Native American. Have critical literary consciousness is what is key and necessary to being able to accurately protray a culture group and write good literature. This is what makes an "insider," in my opinion.
Also, after reading Bishop's article about multicultural literature, my eyes are open to the fact that multicultural children's literature should be synonymous with children's literature because multicultural literal should be the same. I like how Bishop pointed out that multicultural literature often leaves caucasians out and focuses on 'folktwles around the world, people who live outside the united states, religous groups, and people of color' etc and I realize that is quite true, and is not what we should be focusing on. Because multiculturalism focuses on 'several aspects of difference' such as race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, dis/ability, etc., it is important to make sure to include all these culture groups in our libraries as future teachers.
I appreciate the fact that these article opened my eyes to all the groups that are/have been left out by the label 'multicultural' and how it was more synonymous with 'race' than with culture groups.
Until next post.
Monday, September 17, 2007
thoughts on...
Upon finishing Heart of a Chief, I had a lot to consider. I recognized this adolescent book to be possibly the only one, to date, that I have read that is so honest in its multicultural issues.
I thoroughly enjoyed this read.
In terms of characters, Chris Nicola was a strong main character who developed quite rapidly throughout the story.
The plot was intriguing, and although everything seemed to fall into place a little bit too "nice and neatly," I was very satisfied with the outcome. All the questions and 'loose ends' of Chris' life were tied up very nicely within the last two chapters.
I thought it was quite helpful for the authenticity of the book when the author, Bruchac, included Penacook language throughout, in order to give the reader a bit of Penacook heritage. It also made me feel like the author knew what he was talking about in writing this book, instead of someone just writing about general Native Americans. I felt like I was learning about the Penacook tribe and traditions as well as about Chris' life.
According to Sims Bishop's categories of Multicultural literature, I would have to classify this novel as, a Socially Conscious Book, but I would almost also put it as Culturally Conscious, also.
I claim "Socially Conscious" because it 'features a social agenda that is intended to teach. The problem of the book centers around a 'difference'' between the Penacook on the 'rez' and the Caucasians in Rangerville.
I believe one of the issues on the social agenda for this book that Bruchac was trying to get out into the open was that of "Using Indian Names for Sports Teams" (I took this from the actual novel, page 98). In the past, I had heard some debate about this, but had never really taken into account the Native American's point of view.
I know I definitely learned a lot as Chris was talking about the cons of keeping "Indian Names" for sports teams. I liked how Bruchac had Chris open his presentation with a joke that put his plight in terms of dominant culture, with the joke about calling someone "Mr. President" in return for calling someone, "Chief."
It was a simple proclamation like that that made me realize how easy it is to appropriate from a culture and de-value a culture's honor by using them in almost, derogatory ways.
I also think the way Chris discussed all these problems, with using Native American names and traditions in such a light and almost mocking tone, is in a simple way that adolescent readers will understand and relate too. The way it is written is so that it isn't preaching at the reader, it is simply explaining why using Native American traditions for fun is dishonorable to them and their customs, and it is written so effortlessly, that after one reads it, it makes them wonder how they didn't come to such a conclusion on this social issue before.
I realize I may sound jumbled in how I am explaining this right now, but its the best way I can describe what I learned from this read.
Bear with my somewhat garbled rambling, if you will. [smile].
Quickly, I also liked how the social issue of alcoholism was touched on in Chris' story, and that it didn't gloss over how hurtful alcoholism can be. It made Chris' story relatable, and that if a reader had a family member going through the same thing, they could see that there is still a "way back from the woods," and that it may not be easy or have a simple conclusion, but there is always hope...and always something to laugh about!
I also claim that this book is "Culturally Conscious" because it features a distinctive voice that can be attributed to a group of people, and it can positively generalize in some aspects, but never even come close to stereotyping the Penacook or Native American people.
I enjoyed learning about the Penacook culture, and about the differences across Native American nations because I had never had much schooling in this subject before. I respect Chris' character and the way Bruchac used Chris' voice to explain similarities and differences among Native American groups. I felt it was a very safe way to do it, without coming close to stereotyping Native Americans at all.
I appreciate all this book has to offer and will be using it in my future classroom to help my students learn about Native American culture, especially a bit of Penacook culture, in a safe and authentic way.
Until next post.
Wednesday, August 29, 2007
I am a senior at Michigan State University and am majoring in Elementary Education and Integrated Major in English.
I look forward to learning about diversity in literature, and what makes a book diverse. I am also interested in learning about "good" books on diversity as opposed to "bad" books on diversity.
I also look forward to the texts we will be exploring in and out of class and hope to broaden my horizons and enhance my library with diverse literature.
It is my hope that the knowledge I gain from this class will carry through and grow as I become a professional.
In the future, as an educator I hope to possess a library that is full of diversity for all children experience and enjoy.